Repository logo
 
Publication

Comparative life cycle assessment of first- and second-generation ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil

dc.contributor.authorMaga, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorThonemann, Nils
dc.contributor.authorHiebel, Markus
dc.contributor.authorSebastião, Diogo
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Tiago
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, César
dc.contributor.authorGírio, Francisco
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-11T13:50:40Z
dc.date.available2018-10-11T13:50:40Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: Purpose: The use of bagasse and trash from sugarcane fields in ethanol production is supposed to increase the ethanol yield per hectare, to reduce the energy demand, greenhouse gas emissions, and other environmental impacts. In this article, different technological options of ethanol production are investigated and quantified looking at potential environmental impacts. The first generation ethanol from sugarcane is compared to stand-alone second-generation ethanol as well as an integrated first- and second-generation ethanol production. Methods: The method applied for this life cycle assessment follows the ISO standards 14040/44. The data used in this life cycle assessment is mainly derived from process simulation, literature, and primary data collection. Background data was taken from databases such as GaBi and ecoinvent. The life cycle impact assessment follows the default methods at midpoint level recommended by the International Reference Life Cycle Data System. The calculations were performed using the GaBi 7 life cycle assessment software. It is assumed that 50% of sugarcane trash is recovered and used for second-generation ethanol production, whereas the other 50% remain in the field to maintain soil fertility and to prevent soil erosion. In the case of first-generation ethanol, the same amount of trash is used for energy generation. Results and discussion: The results of the life cycle impact assessment show that, compared to first-generation ethanol, secondgeneration ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil allows significant reductions in all investigated impact categories except resource depletion. Resource depletion, however, is strongly influenced by the demand for ammonium phosphate which is needed for inoculum preparation. Integrated first- and second-generation ethanol production also allows reductions in most of the environmental impacts except for global warming, photochemical ozone depletion, and resource depletion. The yield of ethanol per hectare increases since bagasse and trash are used for the production of second-generation ethanol. Consequently, the results show that agricultural land occupation is reduced for integrated first- and second-generation ethanol by approximately 11%, whereas second-generation ethanol allows reduction of land use by approximately a factor of 30. Conclusions: The use of bagasse and trash for ethanol production allows both the reduction of several environmental impacts and land use, in particular, because impacts caused by sugarcane cultivation are avoided. For the integrated first- and second generation ethanol scenario, it is important to further reduce the total energy demand in order to achieve self-sufficiency for the plant energy and to avoid additional emissions from burning fossil fuels.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationMaga, Daniel; Thonemann, Nils; Hiebel, Markus...[et.al.]. - Comparative life cycle assessment of first- and second-generation ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, p. 1-15 [published on-line]pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn0948-3349
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.9/3077
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagpt_PT
dc.relationEuropean Commission under the FP7 Programme (Proethanol2G grant #251151)pt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1505-1pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectBiofuelspt_PT
dc.subjectEthanolpt_PT
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmentpt_PT
dc.subjectSugarcane bagassept_PT
dc.subjectBrazilpt_PT
dc.titleComparative life cycle assessment of first- and second-generation ethanol from sugarcane in Brazilpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage15pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessmentpt_PT
person.familyNameLopes
person.familyNameFonseca
person.familyNameFERREIRA GIRIO
person.givenNameTiago
person.givenNameCésar
person.givenNameFRANCISCO MANUEL
person.identifier284260
person.identifier.ciencia-idD51D-09A4-A2DC
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9720-8777
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2448-7063
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5376-8430
person.identifier.ridA-6757-2010
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55955425000
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4da4a132-d647-4e61-96f4-688c2f52304c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1c613a9f-bca3-465c-b261-8d67dfcaf6ce
relation.isAuthorOfPublication781a0b63-529e-4c34-8dcc-fd27e785e762
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1c613a9f-bca3-465c-b261-8d67dfcaf6ce

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
InternationalJournalLifeCycleAssessment_2018_1-15.pdf
Size:
314.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: