Repository logo
 
Publication

Sustainable value methodology to compare the performance of conversion technologies for the production of electricity and heat, energy vectors and biofuels from waste biomass

2022-09Journal article Open access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMoura, Patrícia
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, José João M. Silva
dc.contributor.authorAlexandre, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Ana Cristina
dc.contributor.authorAbreu, Mariana
dc.contributor.authorGírio, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorCatarino, Justina
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-14T10:55:35Z
dc.date.available2022-10-14T10:55:35Z
dc.date.issued2022-09
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: The Sustainable Value methodology was used to compare and rank eight combinations of waste biomass types and conversion technologies on a common assessment basis to produce energy, energy vectors and advanced biofuels. The studied combinations included agricultural and agro-industrial residues, slurries and effluents, pulp and paper mill sludge, piggery effluents and organic fractions of municipal solid waste, to produce biodiesel by (trans)esterification, biogas by anaerobic digestion, ethanol by fermentation, hydrogen by dark fermentation, electricity and heat by combustion, biogas and synthesis gas by gasification, and bio-oils by pyrolysis or hydrothermal liquefaction. The numerator “Functional Performance” of the Sustainable Value indicator was estimated according to 14 criteria of process technology, material and energy inputs and outputs, and acceptance by the stakeholders. The performance of the technologies was classified based on the values of relative importance (φ) and level of satisfaction (S) attributed to each criterion. The gasification of residues from the olive-oil industry reached the highest “Functional Performance”, followed by anaerobic digestion of chestnut processing residues and pig-rearing effluents. The Sustainable Value denominator “Costs” depended mainly on the degree of maturity of the technologies, which penalised pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction and dark fermentation. The final ranking of the Sustainable Value indicator was gasification> combustion> anaerobic digestion> (trans)esterification> pyrolysis and fermentation to ethanol> hydrothermal liquefaction> dark fermentation, respectively for the most adequate waste biomass types under study. Thermochemical conversions were mainly impacted by process and input criteria, while output and social acceptance criteria were more decisive for the biochemical conversions.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationMoura, Patrícia... [et.al.] - Sustainable value methodology to compare the performance of conversion technologies for the production of electricity and heat, energy vectors and biofuels from waste biomass. In: Cleaner Waste Systems, 2022, vol. 3, article nº 100029pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clwas.2022.100029pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2772-9125
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.9/3918
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relationPOSEUR-01-1001-FC-000001pt_PT
dc.relationBiomass and Bioenergy Research Infrastructure
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2022.100029pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectBioenergypt_PT
dc.subjectBiomass valorisationpt_PT
dc.subjectWaste valorizationpt_PT
dc.subjectSustainable valuept_PT
dc.subjectSustainabilitypt_PT
dc.titleSustainable value methodology to compare the performance of conversion technologies for the production of electricity and heat, energy vectors and biofuels from waste biomasspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardTitleBiomass and Bioenergy Research Infrastructure
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/9444 - RNIIIE/PINFRA%2F22059%2F2016/PT
oaire.citation.titleCleaner Waste Systemspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume3pt_PT
oaire.fundingStream9444 - RNIIIE
person.familyNameMoura
person.familyNameAlexandre
person.familyNameOliveira
person.familyNameAbreu
person.familyNameFERREIRA GIRIO
person.familyNameCatarino
person.givenNamePatrícia
person.givenNameJorge
person.givenNameAna Cristina
person.givenNameMariana
person.givenNameFRANCISCO MANUEL
person.givenNameJustina
person.identifier.ciencia-idBA17-3D3E-5478
person.identifier.ciencia-id4711-F6D2-06FC
person.identifier.ciencia-idD51D-09A4-A2DC
person.identifier.ciencia-idD110-FA89-7B56
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9333-3231
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7102-2387
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5641-8965
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7906-3025
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5376-8430
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8051-9843
person.identifier.ridA-8330-2015
person.identifier.ridL-1426-2016
person.identifier.scopus-author-id15724272200
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb0ec9a1e-8b38-48e2-a76b-a09e13975dcf
relation.isAuthorOfPublication26b9340d-5a5d-4f6f-9724-1e36558524b3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication01e58214-951d-4fe7-a058-20f1b224c559
relation.isAuthorOfPublication61332c2f-12b9-4992-9ac7-8d86fcd9cf6d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication781a0b63-529e-4c34-8dcc-fd27e785e762
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbbe6985a-13d1-499c-8517-5dd7bb6bf14c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybbe6985a-13d1-499c-8517-5dd7bb6bf14c
relation.isProjectOfPublication33702244-8cb8-45d4-b730-c1f16ae5be4e
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscovery33702244-8cb8-45d4-b730-c1f16ae5be4e

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A2_2022_Mouraetal_2022_Sustainable value methodology to compare the performance.pdf
Size:
6.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

ER - Artigos em revistas internacionais